Stephen F. Austin
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
527  Shelby Pesek JR 20:59
592  Brittany Innis FR 21:03
611  Courtney High FR 21:05
757  Samantha Ottman SO 21:16
1,073  Bridgette Kozar SO 21:38
1,176  Katrina Fite SO 21:44
1,327  Taylor Bohr FR 21:53
2,296  Macy Davis FR 22:53
2,618  Laurie Byrd SR 23:18
National Rank #127 of 341
South Central Region Rank #11 of 35
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 8th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 4.2%
Top 10 in Regional 88.1%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Shelby Pesek Brittany Innis Courtney High Samantha Ottman Bridgette Kozar Katrina Fite Taylor Bohr Macy Davis Laurie Byrd
Chile Pepper Festival 10/04 1171 20:56 21:27 21:18 21:38 21:47 22:10 22:20 22:45
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/17 1094 20:56 20:49 21:02 21:50 21:23 21:37 21:51 23:07 21:26
Southland Conference Championships 11/03 1051 21:15 20:50 20:47 20:50 21:24 21:39 21:53 25:42
South Central Region Championships 11/14 1114 20:57 21:12 21:11 20:54 21:59 21:38 21:36





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0% 30.0 759 0.0
Region Championship 100% 8.5 249 0.0 0.5 3.6 7.5 12.4 25.6 21.7 16.8 10.8 1.0 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Shelby Pesek 0.0% 167.5
Brittany Innis 0.0% 171.5
Courtney High 0.0% 180.5
Samantha Ottman 0.0% 175.5
Bridgette Kozar 0.0% 237.5
Katrina Fite 0.0% 238.5
Taylor Bohr 0.0% 240.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Shelby Pesek 37.7 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.9 1.3 1.8
Brittany Innis 41.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.8
Courtney High 42.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.9
Samantha Ottman 52.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1
Bridgette Kozar 72.7
Katrina Fite 77.8
Taylor Bohr 84.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 0.0% 50.0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 3
4 0.5% 0.5 4
5 3.6% 3.6 5
6 7.5% 7.5 6
7 12.4% 12.4 7
8 25.6% 25.6 8
9 21.7% 21.7 9
10 16.8% 16.8 10
11 10.8% 10.8 11
12 1.0% 1.0 12
13 0.1% 0.1 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
Total 100% 0.0% 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0